ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Inter-rater reliability of pressure biofeedback unit among individuals with and without chronic low back pain.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Strength Deficits of Core and Hip Stabilizers in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Digital delivery of the GDS method for chronic lumbosacral discogenic pain: A pilot study aligning Sustainable development Goals three and four.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Associations Between Physiological Characteristics and Physical Performance in Amputee Soccer Players: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Correlation between concurrent activation potentiation of hand grip strength and core stability endurance in medical university students.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Biopsychosocial Model-Based Care versus Routine Physical Therapy on Clinical, Sensorimotor, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- The impact of biofeedback in enhancing chronic pain rehabilitation: A systematic review of mechanisms and outcomes.Heliyon · 2025Review
- Effects of different lower limb movement velocities on trunk muscle activity and dynamic stability in the Sahrmann core stability test.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- The effects of lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movements in non-specific low back pain (A randomized controlled trial).Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Clinical efficacy of breathing training combined with core stability training in chronic nonspecific low back pain.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the inter-rater reliability of pressure biofeedback unit among individuals with and without chronic low back pain. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 2021 to March 2021 at the Physiotherapy Department of the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Sixteen subjects which were recruited with and without chronic low back pain.(CLBP). During the test, abdominal drawing in movement was monitored by measuring a change in pressure detected in PBU. Each test was performed once by two trained assessors with period of seven days. Reliability indices of Pressure Biofeedback (PBU) measures including the Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] and Band Altman plot were analyzed. Results: This study found an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.37, 0.99] for inter-rater reliability in healthy individuals, and an ICC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.97, 0.98) for inter-rater reliability in CLBP. The interrater agreement (Limits of Agreement-LOA=5.92, -3.9 mmHg) in CLBP and the interrater agreement (LOA=5.75, -3.25 mmHg) in healthy individuals were within the limits of agreement on 95% of occasions. Conclusion: Pressure Biofeedback Unit has showed excellent inter-rater reliability in measuring Transverse Abdominis muscle activity for individuals with and without chronic LBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.