ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Calibration of cine MRI segmentation probability for uncertainty estimation using a multi-task cross-task learning architecture.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While deep learning has shown potential in solving a variety of medical image analysis problems including segmentation, registration, motion estimation, etc., their applications in the real-world clinical setting are still not affluent due to the lack of reliability caused by the failures of deep learning models in prediction. Furthermore, deep learning models need a large number of labeled datasets. In this work, we propose a novel method that incorporates uncertainty estimation to detect failures in the segmentation masks generated by CNNs. Our study further showcases the potential of our model to evaluate the correlation between the uncertainty and the segmentation errors for a given model. Furthermore, we introduce a multi-task cross-task learning consistency approach to enforce the correlation between the pixel-level (segmentation) and the geometric-level (distance map) tasks. Our extensive experimentation with varied quantities of labeled data in the training sets justifies the effectiveness of our model for the segmentation and uncertainty estimation of the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), and myocardium (Myo) at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) phases from cine MRI images available through the MICCAI 2017 ACDC Challenge Dataset. Our study serves as a proof-of-concept of how uncertainty measure correlates with the erroneous segmentation generated by different deep learning models, further showcasing the potential of our model to flag low-quality segmentation from a given model in our future study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.