Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634444›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2022

Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Methylation and Transcriptome to Identify PD-1-Negative Prognostic Methylated Signature in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Lu Cao, Xiaoqian Ma, Pengfei Rong, Juan Zhang, Min Yang, Wei Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lu CaoDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3602-0340
Xiaoqian MaDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, China.
Pengfei RongDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, China.
Juan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, China.
Min YangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-7846
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Epigenetic mechanism plays an important role in endometrial carcinoma (EC). This study was designed to analyze the epigenetic mechanism between DNA methylation-driven genes (DEDGs) and drugs targeting DEDGs and to develop a DEDG score model for predicting the prognosis of EC. Methods: Expression profile and methylation profile data of PD-1-negative EC samples were obtained from TCGA. To obtain intersected DEDGs, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially methylated genes from tumor tissues and normal tissues were analyzed by limma. A linear discriminant classification model was constructed using the gene expression profile of DMDGs, methylation profile of TSS1500, TSS200, and gene body regions. Principal component analysis (PCA) and ROC analysis were conducted. The protein-drug interactions analysis of DMDGs was performed using Network Analyst 3.0 tool. Lasso Cox regression analysis was used to screen prognostic DNA methylation driving gene and to build a risk score model. The ROC curve and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were plotted to evaluate the model prediction capability. Results: A total of 96 DMDGs were screened from the three regions, distributed on 22 chromosomes, with consistent methylation patterns in different gene regions. Both the expression profile and methylation profile of the three regions can neatly distinguish tumor samples from normal ones, with a high classifying performance. A gene signature, which consisted of ELFN1-AS1 and ZNF132, could classify EC patients into a high-risk group and low-risk group. Prognosis of the high-risk group was significantly worse than that of the low-risk group. The risk model showed a high performance in predicting the prognosis of EC. Conclusion: We successfully established a risk score system with two DMDGs, which showed a high prediction accuracy of EC prognosis.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTranscriptomeProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID35634444
PMCPMC9133896
OpenAlexW4280550664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.