Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634380›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Evaluation of a Fully Automatic Deep Learning-Based Method for the Measurement of Psoas Muscle Area.

Dennis Van Erck, Pim Moeskops, Josje D Schoufour, Peter J M Weijs, Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer, Martijn S Van Mourik, Yvonne C Janmaat, R Nils Planken, Marije Vis, Jan Baan and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The association of radiologic body composition parameters with clinical outcomes in level-1 trauma patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis Van ErckDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Pim MoeskopsQuantib-U, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Josje D SchoufourFaculty of Sports and Nutrition, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Peter J M WeijsFaculty of Sports and Nutrition, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wilma J M Scholte Op ReimerDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martijn S Van MourikDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Yvonne C JanmaatDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
R Nils PlankenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherslands.
Marije VisDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jan BaanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Robert HemkeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherslands.
Ivana IšgumDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherslands.
José P HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bob D De VosQuantib-U, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ronak DelewiDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Manual muscle mass assessment based on Computed Tomography (CT) scans is recognized as a good marker for malnutrition, sarcopenia, and adverse outcomes. However, manual muscle mass analysis is cumbersome and time consuming. An accurate fully automated method is needed. In this study, we evaluate if manual psoas annotation can be substituted by a fully automatic deep learning-based method. Methods: This study included a cohort of 583 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis planned to undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). Psoas muscle area was annotated manually on the CT scan at the height of lumbar vertebra 3 (L3). The deep learning-based method mimics this approach by first determining the L3 level and subsequently segmenting the psoas at that level. The fully automatic approach was evaluated as well as segmentation and slice selection, using average bias 95% limits of agreement, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and within-subject Coefficient of Variation (CV). To evaluate performance of the slice selection visual inspection was performed. To evaluate segmentation Dice index was computed between the manual and automatic segmentations (0 = no overlap, 1 = perfect overlap). Results: Included patients had a mean age of 81 Conclusion: Fully automatic assessment of psoas muscle area demonstrates accurate performance at the L3 level in CT images. It is a reliable tool that offers great opportunities for analysis in large scale studies and in clinical applications.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebody compositioncomputed tomographymuscle assessmentpsoas muscle area (PMA)sarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID35634380
PMCPMC9133929
OpenAlexW4280644310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.