Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634254›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Effectiveness of Integrated Diabetes Care Interventions Involving Diabetes Specialists Working in Primary and Community Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reetu Zarora, Jincy Immanuel, Tawanda Chivese, Freya MacMillan, David Simmons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Virtual care in patients with type 2 diabetes during covid-19Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Reetu ZaroraSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism Translational Research Unit, Macarthur Clinical School, Campbelltown, New South Wales, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5866-8300
Jincy ImmanuelSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism Translational Research Unit, Macarthur Clinical School, Campbelltown, New South Wales, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2020-4791
Tawanda ChiveseDepartment of Population Medicine, College of medicine, QU Health Qatar University, Doha, QA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-6144
Freya MacMillanSchool of Health Science, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism Translational Research Unit, The Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-2465
David SimmonsSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism Translational Research Unit, The Translational Health Research Institute, Macarthur Clinical School, Campbelltown, New South Wales, AU.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0560-0761
Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUTranslational Research Institute · AUQatar University · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence that integrated diabetes care interventions can substantially improve clinical outcomes is mixed. However, previous systematic reviews have not focussed on clinical effectiveness where the endocrinologist was actively involved in guiding diabetes management. Methods: We searched EMBASE, COCHRANE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Google Scholar databases and grey literature published in English language up to 25 January 2021. Reviewed articles included Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) and pre-post studies testing the effectiveness on clinical outcomes after ≥6 months intervention in non-pregnant adults (age ≥ 18 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two reviewers independently extracted data and completed a risk of bias assessment. Appropriate meta-analyses for each outcome from RCTs and pre-post studies were performed. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Results: We reviewed 4 RCTs and 12 pre-post studies. The integrated care model of diabetes specialists working with primary care health professionals had a positive impact on HbA1c in both RCTs and pre-post studies and on systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and weight in pre-post studies. In the RCTs, interventions reduced HbA1c (-0.10% [-0.15 to -0.05]) (-1.1 mmol/mol [-1.6 to -0.5]), versus control. Pre-post studies demonstrated improvements in HbA1c (-0.77% [-1.12 to -0.42]) (-8.4 mmol/mol [-12.2 to -4.6]), systolic blood pressure (-3.30 mmHg [-5.16 to -1.44]), diastolic blood pressure (-3.61 mmHg [-4.82 to -2.39]), total cholesterol (-0.33 mmol/L [-0.52 to -0.14]) and weight (-2.53 kg [-3.86 to -1.19]). In a pre-post study with no control group only 4% patients experienced hypoglycaemia after one year of intervention compared to baseline. Conclusions: Integrated interventions with an active endocrinologist involvement can result in modest improvements in HbA1c, blood pressure and weight management. Although the improvements per clinical outcome are modest, there is possible net improvements at a holistic level.

Indexed as

clinical outcomecost-effectivenessdiabetes mellitusintegrated health care systemsmultidisciplinary careprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID35634254
PMCPMC9104489
OpenAlexW4280628947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.