Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634193›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2022

Laparoscopic Surgery for Acute Diffuse Peritonitis Due to Gastrointestinal Perforation: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Study Using the National Clinical Database.

Nobuaki Hoshino, Hideki Endo, Koya Hida, Hiraku Kumamaru, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Teruhide Ishigame, Yuko Kitagawa, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Hiroaki Miyata, Yoshiharu Sakai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nobuaki HoshinoDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-8971
Hideki EndoDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment Tokyo University Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0052-0332
Koya HidaDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-7075
Hiraku KumamaruDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment Tokyo University Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-6191
Hiroshi HasegawaProject Management Subcommittee The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-0509
Teruhide IshigameProject Management Subcommittee The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.
Yuko KitagawaThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiDatabase Committee The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0241
Hiroaki MiyataDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment Tokyo University Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Yoshiharu SakaiDepartment of Surgery Osaka Red Cross Hospital Osaka Japan.
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery · JPTokyo Health Care University · JPKyoto University · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elective laparoscopic surgery is now widely accepted in the treatment of abdominal diseases because of its minimal invasiveness and rapid postoperative recovery. It is also used in the emergency setting for the diagnosis and treatment of acute diffuse peritonitis regardless of the causative disease. However, the value of laparoscopy in acute diffuse peritonitis remains unclear. In this study we aimed to show trends in the use of laparoscopy over time and compare the real-world performance of laparoscopic surgery with that of open surgery for acute diffuse peritonitis due to gastrointestinal perforation. Methods: We extracted data from the National Clinical Database, a nationwide surgery registration system in Japan, for patients with a diagnosis of acute diffuse peritonitis due to gastroduodenal or colorectal perforation between 2016 and 2019. Trends in the use of laparoscopy over time were identified. Patient characteristics, laboratory findings, surgical findings, and postoperative complications were compared between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery. Results: Patients in poor condition and those with abnormal laboratory findings tended to undergo open surgery. Anesthesia time and operating time were longer for laparoscopic surgery in patients with gastroduodenal perforation but shorter in those with colorectal perforation. Fewer complications occurred in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The number of institutions where laparoscopic surgery was performed and the proportion of the use of laparoscopy at each institution increased over time. Conclusion: The use of laparoscopy is becoming common in surgery for acute diffuse peritonitis due to gastrointestinal perforation. This approach may be a useful option for acute diffuse peritonitis.

Indexed as

emergency surgerygastrointestinal perforationlaparoscopic surgeryperitonitis

Identifiers

PMID35634193
PMCPMC9130886
OpenAlexW4200527034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.