Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634182›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2022

Evaluation of postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives of small remnant distal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer using a large-scale questionnaire survey.

Souya Nunobe, Masazumi Takahashi, Shinichi Kinami, Junya Fujita, Takahisa Suzuki, Akihiro Suzuki, Toshiyuki Tanahashi, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi, Atsushi Oshio, Koji Nakada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. y-shaped side overlap esophagogastrostomy in proximal gastrectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A knack is needed to perform a function-preserving gastrectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Souya NunobeDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery Cancer Institute Ariake Hospital Koto-ku Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3012-5632
Masazumi TakahashiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Yokohama Municipal Cirizen's Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Shinichi KinamiDepartment of Surgical Oncology Kanazawa Medical University Kahoku-gun Japan.
Junya FujitaDepartment of surgery Yao Municipal Hospital Osaka Japan.
Takahisa SuzukiDepartment of Surgery National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center Chu-goku Cancer Center Hiroshima Japan.
Akihiro SuzukiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery St. Luke's International Hospital Chuo-ku Japan.
Toshiyuki TanahashiDepartment of Surgery Gifu Municipal Hospital Gifu Japan.
Yoshihiko KawaguchiFirst Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Yamanashi Chuo Japan.
Atsushi OshioFaculty of Letters, Arts and Sciences Waseda University Shinjuku-ku Japan.
Koji NakadaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Gifu Municipal Hospital · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOsaka Municipal College of Design · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPUniversity of Yamanashi · JPWaseda University · JPYokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Total gastrectomy (TG) is often performed for proximal gastric cancer. Small remnant distal gastrectomy (SRDG) can also be used in cases where surgical margins can be secured. The impact of preserving proximal small remnant stomach on postoperative quality of life (QOL) has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we compared postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives between patients undergoing SRDG and those undergoing TG for proximal gastric cancer using the developed Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45. Methods: Of the 1909 patients enrolled in the PGSAS NEXT study, univariate analysis of 19 main outcomes measures (MOMs) of PGSAS-45 was performed in patients undergoing TG (n = 1020) or SRDG (n = 54). Multiple regression analysis was performed with several clinical factors as explanatory variables. Results: There was no difference in age and sex between TG and SRDG groups. In SRDG group, postoperative period was shorter, the rates of laparoscopic approach and preservation of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve were higher, and the rates of clinical stage III/IV disease, ≥D2 dissection, and combined resection with other organs were lower than in the TG group significantly ( Conclusion: The PGSAS-45 revealed that SRDG was associated with better postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives than TG.

Indexed as

patient‐reported outcomespostgastrectomy symptomsproximal gastric cancersmall remnant distal gastrectomytotal gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID35634182
PMCPMC9130885
OpenAlexW4200116066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.