ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2022
Pseudomonal Diabetic Foot Infections: Vive la Différence?
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Charting new territory: outpatient stewardship in immunocompromised patients (first of a two-part series).Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- Novel antimicrobial strategies for diabetic foot infections: addressing challenges and resistance.Acta diabetologica · 2025Review
- Antibiotic Stewardship in the Management of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcer Disease in Less Developed Countries.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2024Review
- Antimicrobial resistance is not increasing in subsequent cases of ischaemic foot infections, a single-centre cohort from 2012 to 2021.International wound journal · 2024Article
- What's old is new again: Insights into diabetic foot microbiome.World journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- Influence of Skin Commensals on Therapeutic Outcomes of Surgically Debrided Diabetic Foot Infections-A Large Retrospective Comparative Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the outcomes of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) due to Patients and Methods: From April 24, 2013 to July 31, 2016, we analyzed data from patients prospectively enrolled in our clinical pathway of DFIs, comparing those with infection due to Results: Overall, we assessed 1018 cases of DFIs: 392 with osteomyelitis and 626 with only soft tissue infections. The prevalence of Conclusion: For DFIs caused by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.