ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
A multicenter prospective study on quality of life and pain relief for cancer patient after
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and Associated Factors for Chronic Pain After ICU Discharge: A Prospective Study.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Current perspectives and emerging trends in iodine-125 seed implantation: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Clinical efficacy of iodine-125 radioactive particle implantation with deep hyperthermia in malignant tumor treatment: A retrospective analysis.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To prospectively explore the efficacy of Methods: Consecutive cancer patients who underwent Results: A total of 104 cancer patients were enroled. Total score of quality of life was not statistically different 3 months after seed implantation compared with before implantation, while patients' quality of life was worse one week after seed implantation but then recovered. A total of 43 (41.3%) patients had pain before seed implantation, of which 16 (37.2%) patients had severe pain and 27 (62.8%) had mild-to-moderate pain. In patients with severe pain, the worst pain scores decreased significantly 3 months after implantation. In patients with mild-to-moderate pain, pain severity and pain interference score increased significantly after implantation compared with pre-implantation. Compared with pain before implantation, patients' quality of life of patients without pain was higher. Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.