Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634122›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Evaluation of feature projection techniques in object grasp classification using electromyogram signals from different limb positions.

Nantarika Thiamchoo, Pornchai Phukpattaranont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nantarika ThiamchooDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Pornchai PhukpattaranontDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A myoelectric prosthesis is manipulated using electromyogram (EMG) signals from the existing muscles for performing the activities of daily living. A feature vector that is formed by concatenating data from many EMG channels may result in a high dimensional space, which may cause prolonged computation time, redundancy, and irrelevant information. We evaluated feature projection techniques, namely principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), and spectral regression extreme learning machine (SRELM), applied to object grasp classification. These represent feature projections that are combinations of either linear or nonlinear, and supervised or unsupervised types. All pairs of the four types of feature projection with seven types of classifiers were evaluated, with data from six EMG channels and an IMU sensors for nine upper limb positions in the transverse plane. The results showed that SRELM outperformed LDA with supervised feature projections, and t-SNE was superior to PCA with unsupervised feature projections. The classification errors from SRELM and t-SNE paired with the seven classifiers were from 1.50% to 2.65% and from 1.27% to 17.15%, respectively. A one-way ANOVA test revealed no statistically significant difference by classifier type when using the SRELM projection, which is a nonlinear supervised feature projection (

Indexed as

Dimensionality reductionElectromyogram signalFeature projectionHand grasp classificationLimb position change

Identifiers

PMID35634122
PMCPMC9138131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.