Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634118›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Feature selection of EEG signals in neuromarketing.

Abeer Al-Nafjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abeer Al-NafjanComputer Science, Al-Imam Mohamed Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology uses electrophysiological (EEG) signals to detect user intent. Research on BCI has seen rapid advancement, with researchers proposing and implementing several signal processing and machine learning approaches for use in different contexts. BCI technology is also used in neuromarketing to study the brain's responses to marketing stimuli. This study sought to detect two preference states (like and dislike) in EEG neuromarketing data using the proposed EEG-based consumer preference recognition system. This study investigated the role of feature selection in BCI to improve the accuracy of preference detection for neuromarketing. Several feature selection methods were used for benchmark testing in multiple BCI studies. Four feature selection approaches, namely, principal component analysis (PCA), minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), recursive feature elimination (RFE), and ReliefF, were used with five different classifiers: deep neural network (DNN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and random forest (RF). The four approaches were compared to evaluate the importance of feature selection. Moreover, the performance of classification algorithms was evaluated before and after feature selection. It was found that feature selection for EEG signals improves the performance of all classifiers.

Indexed as

Brain computer interface (BCI)Consumer preferencesDeep neural network (DNN)Electroencephalogram (EEG)Neuromarketing

Identifiers

PMID35634118
PMCPMC9138093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.