ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
Malware detection framework based on graph variational autoencoder extracted embeddings from API-call graphs.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of BERT and FastText representations on crowdfunding campaign success prediction.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- A Kullback-Liebler divergence-based representation algorithm for malware detection.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malware harms the confidentiality and integrity of the information that causes material and moral damages to institutions or individuals. This study proposed a malware detection model based on API-call graphs and used Graph Variational Autoencoder (GVAE) to reduce the size of graph node features extracted from Android apk files. GVAE-reduced embeddings were fed to linear-based (SVM) and ensemble-based (LightGBM) models to finalize the malware detection process. To validate the effectiveness of the GVAE-reduced features, recursive feature elimination (RFE) and Fisher score (FS) were applied to select informative feature sets with the same sizes as GVAE-reduced embeddings. The results with RFE and FS selections revealed that LightGBM and RFE-selected 50 features achieved the highest accuracy (0.907) and F-measure (0.852) rates. When we used GVAE-reduced embeddings in the classification, there was an approximate increase of %4 in both models' accuracy rates. The same performance increase occurred in F-measure rates which directly indicated the improvement in the discrimination powers of the models. The last conducted experiment that combined the strengths of RFE selection and GVAE led to a performance increase compared to only GVAE-reduced embeddings. RFE selection achieved an accuracy rate of 0.967 in LightGBM with the help of selected 30 relevant features from the combination of all GVAE-embeddings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.