ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Application Research for Fusion Model of Pseudolabel and Cross Network.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Datasets usually suffer from supervised information missing and weak generalization ability in deep convolution neural network. In this paper, pseudolabel (PL) of Weakly Supervised Learning (WSL) was used to address the problem of supervised information missing, while Cross Network (CN) of Multitask Learning (MTL) was used to solve the problem of weak generalization ability in deep convolution neural network. In PL, the data of supervised information missing was predicted; thus, PL of the corresponding data was generated. In CN, PL data and labeled data were taken as two tasks to train together. Firstly, the labeled data was divided into training dataset and testing dataset, respectively, and image preprocessing was carried out. Secondly, the network was initialized and trained, and the model with high accuracy and good generalization was selected as the optimal model. Then, the optimal model was used to predict the unlabeled data and generate PL. Finally, the steps above were repeated several times to find a better optimal model. In the experiments of the fusion model of PL and CN, Facial Beauty Prediction was regarded as main task and the others as auxiliary tasks. Experimental results show that the model was suitable for multitask training of different tasks in different or similar datasets, and the accuracy of the main task of Facial Beauty Prediction reaches 64.76%, higher than the highest accuracy by conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.