Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634010›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2022

An Adaptation of the RAND/UCLA Modified Delphi Panel Method in the Time of COVID-19.

Michael S Broder, Sarah N Gibbs, Irina Yermilov

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06324903 (Role of Echocardiography in Optimization of Cardiac Catheterization Performance in Children With Congenital Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06324903 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Role of Echocardiography in Optimization of Cardiac Catheterization Performance in Children With Congenital Heart Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled67ConditionsEchocardiographyArmsechocardiography and percutaneous cardiac catheterization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost calculation model of introducing Upadacitinib and Risankizumab for adult ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  6. The Public Health Communication Competency Framework: Results from a multi-method and consensus-building process.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael S BroderOutcomes Research, Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2049-5536
Sarah N GibbsOutcomes Research, Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1215-642X
Irina YermilovOutcomes Research, Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6035-2815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel method is a formal group consensus process that systematically and quantitatively combines expert opinion and evidence by asking panelists to rate, discuss, then re-rate items. The method has been used to develop medical society guidelines, other clinical practice guidelines, disease classification systems, research agendas, and quality improvement interventions. Traditionally, a group of experts meet in person to discuss results of a first-round survey. After the meeting, experts complete a second-round survey used to develop areas of consensus. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this aspect of the method was not possible. As such, we have adapted the method to conduct virtual RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panels. In this study, we present a targeted literature review to describe and summarize the existing evidence on the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel method and outline our adaptation for conducting these panels virtually. Transitioning from in-person to virtual meetings was not without challenges, but there have also been unexpected advantages. The method we describe here can be a cost-effective and efficient alternative for researchers and clinicians.

Indexed as

consensusCOVID-19Delphi panelexpert panelpandemicvirtual meeting

Identifiers

PMID35634010
PMCPMC9130741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.