Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Comparing Descriptive Statistics for Retrospective Studies From One-per-Minute and One-per-Second Data.

Hylke H Salverda, Janneke Dekker, Ruben S G M Witlox, Peter A Dargaville, Steffen Pauws, Arjan B Te Pas

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hylke H SalverdaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Janneke DekkerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Ruben S G M WitloxDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Peter A DargavillePaediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Steffen PauwsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Arjan B Te PasDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large amounts of data are collected in neonatal intensive care units, which could be used for research. It is unclear whether these data, usually sampled at a lower frequency, are sufficient for retrospective studies. We investigated what to expect when using one-per-minute data for descriptive statistics. Methods: One-per-second inspiratory oxygen and saturation were processed to one-per-minute data and compared, on average, standard deviation, target range time, hypoxia, days of supplemental oxygen, and missing signal. Results: Outcomes calculated from data recordings (one-per-minute = 92, one-per-second = 92) showed very little to no difference. Sub analyses of recordings under 100 and 200 h showed no difference. Conclusion: In our study, descriptive statistics of one-per-minute data were comparable to one-per-second and could be used for retrospective analyses. Comparable routinely collected one-per-minute data could be used to develop algorithms or find associations, retrospectively.

Indexed as

datamethodologyneonatologyretrospectivetechnology

Identifiers

PMID35633953
PMCPMC9133439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.