Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633922›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Early Diagnosis of Brain Tumour MRI Images Using Hybrid Techniques between Deep and Machine Learning.

Ebrahim Mohammed Senan, Mukti E Jadhav, Taha H Rassem, Abdulaziz Salamah Aljaloud, Badiea Abdulkarem Mohammed, Zeyad Ghaleb Al-Mekhlafi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging Wearable Acoustic Sensing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ebrahim Mohammed SenanDepartment of Computer Science, Hajjah University, Hajjah, Yemen.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4635-929X
Mukti E JadhavShri Shivaji Science & Arts College, Chikhli Dist., Buldana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-5228
Taha H RassemFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6259-0622
Abdulaziz Salamah AljaloudCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Badiea Abdulkarem MohammedCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-4161
Zeyad Ghaleb Al-MekhlafiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-0309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is considered one of the most aggressive and destructive diseases that shortens the average lives of patients. Misdiagnosed brain tumours lead to false medical intervention, which reduces patients' chance of survival. Accurate early medical diagnoses of brain tumour are an essential point for starting treatment plans that improve the survival of patients with brain tumours. Computer-aided diagnostic systems have provided consecutive successes for helping medical doctors make accurate diagnoses and have conducted positive strides in the field of deep and machine learning. Deep convolutional layers extract strong distinguishing features from the regions of interest compared with those extracted using traditional methods. In this study, different experiments are performed for brain tumour diagnosis by combining deep learning and traditional machine learning techniques. AlexNet and ResNet-18 are used with the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm for brain tumour classification and diagnosis. Brain tumour magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images are enhanced using the average filter technique. Then, deep learning techniques are applied to extract robust and important deep features via deep convolutional layers. The process of combining deep and machine learning techniques starts, where features are extracted using deep learning techniques, namely, AlexNet and ResNet-18. These features are then classified using SoftMax and SVM. The MRI dataset contains 3,060 images divided into four classes, which are three tumours and one normal. All systems have achieved superior results. Specifically, the AlexNet+SVM hybrid technique exhibits the best performance, with 95.10% accuracy, 95.25% sensitivity, and 98.50% specificity.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID35633922
PMCPMC9132638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.