Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633896›Full record

ReviewACS catalysis2022

Computational Modeling of Supramolecular Metallo-organic Cages-Challenges and Opportunities.

Tomasz K Piskorz, Vicente Martí-Centelles, Tom A Young, Paul J Lusby, Fernanda Duarte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS catalysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unbiased Structure Prediction of Sophisticated Cage Structures.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Solvent-Controlled Separation of Integratively Self-Sorted PdAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Synthesis of a PdInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  12. CageCavityCalc (Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomasz K PiskorzChemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-6874
Vicente Martí-CentellesInstituto Interuniversitario de Investigación de Reconocimiento Molecular y Desarrollo Tecnológico (IDM), Universitat Politècnica de València, Universitat de València, Valencia 46022, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9142-9392
Tom A YoungChemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom.
Paul J LusbyEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Joseph Black Building, David Brewster Road, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3FJ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-5687
Fernanda DuarteChemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-8209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-assembled metallo-organic cages have emerged as promising biomimetic platforms that can encapsulate whole substrates akin to an enzyme active site. Extensive experimental work has enabled access to a variety of structures, with a few notable examples showing catalytic behavior. However, computational investigations of metallo-organic cages are scarce, not least due to the challenges associated with their modeling and the lack of accurate and efficient protocols to evaluate these systems. In this review, we discuss key molecular principles governing the design of functional metallo-organic cages, from the assembly of building blocks through binding and catalysis. For each of these processes, computational protocols will be reviewed, considering their inherent strengths and weaknesses. We will demonstrate that while each approach may have its own specific pitfalls, they can be a powerful tool for rationalizing experimental observables and to guide synthetic efforts. To illustrate this point, we present several examples where modeling has helped to elucidate fundamental principles behind molecular recognition and reactivity. We highlight the importance of combining computational and experimental efforts to speed up supramolecular catalyst design while reducing time and resources.

Identifiers

PMID35633896
PMCPMC9127791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.