Corrigendum to "Degradation of 3D-printed magnesium phosphate ceramics in vitro and a prognosis on their bone regeneration potential" [Bioact. Mater. 19 (2023) 376-391/22].

Eugen Gefel, Claus Moseke, Anna-Maria Schmitt, Niklas Dümmler, Philipp Stahlhut, Andrea Ewald, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg, Elke Vorndran

Abstract readPublished Erratum

PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher

In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

Ready-To-Use and Rapidly Biodegradable Magnesium Phosphate Bone Cement: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
Article
Comparison of degradation behavior and osseointegration of 3D powder-printed calcium magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds with alkaline or acid post-treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Erratum for
Degradation of 3D-printed magnesium phosphate ceramics2023

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eugen GefelInstitute and Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Clinic Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Claus MosekeInstitute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), University of Applied Sciences Mittelhessen (THM), Wiesenstraße 14, Gießen, Germany.

Anna-Maria SchmittInstitute and Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Clinic Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Niklas DümmlerInstitute and Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Clinic Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Philipp StahlhutInstitute and Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Clinic Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Andrea EwaldInstitute and Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Clinic Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Andrea Meyer-LindenbergClinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.

Elke VorndranInstitute and Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Clinic Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.04.015.].

Identifiers

PMID35633870

DOI10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.014

PMCPMC9127104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.