ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022
Robustness of radiomic features in magnetic resonance imaging for patients with glioblastoma: Multi-center study.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clot Composition Profiling in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Via Radiomics.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcome and deep learning imaging characteristics of patients treated by radio-chemotherapy for a "molecular" glioblastoma.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Impact of intensity standardisation and ComBat batch size on clinical-radiomic prognostic models performance in a multi-centre study of patients with glioblastoma.European radiology · 2025Article
- T2-weighted MRI radiomics for the prediction of pediatric and young adult rhabdomyosarcoma alveolar subtype and distant metastasis: a pilot study.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Robust vs. Non-robust radiomic features: the quest for optimal machine learning models using phantom and clinical studies.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Reproducibility and repeatability of 18F-(2S, 4R)-4-fluoroglutamine PET imaging in preclinical oncology models.PloS one · 2025Article
- Radiomics score derived from T1-w/T2-w ratio image can predict motor symptom progression in Parkinson's disease.European radiology · 2024Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features stability in brain metastases: Impact of image preprocessing, image-, and feature-level harmonization.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Deeply 3D-T1-TFE hypointense voxels are characteristic of phase-rim lesions in multiple sclerosis.European radiology · 2024Article
- MRI-based Machine Learning Radiomics Can Predict CSF1R Expression Level and Prognosis in High-grade Gliomas.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Role of MRI radiomics for the prediction of MYCN amplification in neuroblastomas.European radiology · 2023Article
- The role of parametric feature maps to correct different volume of interest sizes: an in vivo liver MRI study.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Review
- Radiogenomics Analysis Linking Multiparametric MRI and Transcriptomics in Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
- How Radiomics Can Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of Wavelet Kernels on Predictive Capability of Radiomic Features: A Case Study on COVID-19 Chest X-ray Images.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- MRI radiomics and potential applications to glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Evaluation of Radiomic Features in Normal Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Investigating Robustness and Region Variations.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Radiomics offers great potential in improving diagnosis and treatment for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. However, in order to implement radiomics in clinical routine, the features used for prognostic modelling need to be stable. This comprises significant challenge in multi-center studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different image normalization methods on MRI features robustness in multi-center study. Methods: Radiomics stability was checked on magnetic resonance images of eleven patients. The images were acquired in two different hospitals using contrast-enhanced T1 sequences. The images were normalized using one of five investigated approaches including grey-level discretization, histogram matching and z-score. Then, radiomic features were extracted and features stability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients. In the second part of the study, improvement in the prognostic performance of features was tested on 60 patients derived from publicly available dataset. Results: Depending on the normalization scheme, the percentage of stable features varied from 3.4% to 8%. The histogram matching based on the tumor region showed the highest amount of the stable features (113/1404); while normalization using fixed bin size resulted in 48 stable features. The histogram matching also led to better prognostic value (median c-index increase of 0.065) comparing to non-normalized images. Conclusions: MRI normalization plays an important role in radiomics. Appropriate normalization helps to select robust features, which can be used for prognostic modelling in multicenter studies. In our study, histogram matching based on tumor region improved both stability of radiomic features and their prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.