Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633832›Full record

ArticleHealth services research and managerial epidemiology

A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis: Induced Abortion Complications Mistaken for Miscarriage in the Emergency Room are a Risk Factor for Hospitalization.

J Studnicki, T Longbons, D J Harrison, I Skop, C Cirucci, D C Reardon, C Craver, J W Fisher, M Tsulukidze

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research and managerial epidemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2024-02-05Bias Issues or Lack of Balance · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Image · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Conflict of Interest · Error in Analyses · Error in Data · Error in Results and/or Conclusions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Data · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J StudnickiCharlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-7493
T LongbonsCharlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-9166
D J HarrisonAmerican Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Eau Claire, MI, USA.
I SkopCharlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.
C CirucciCharlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-6529
D C ReardonElliot Institute, Springfield, IL, USA.
C CraverCharlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.
J W FisherCharlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.
M TsulukidzeFlorida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists · USFlorida Gulf Coast University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Previous research indicates that an increasing number of women who go to an emergency room for complications following an induced abortion are treated for a miscarriage, meaning their abortion is miscoded or concealed. Objective: To determine if the failure to identify a prior induced abortion during an ER visit is a risk factor for higher rates of subsequent hospitalization. Methods: Post hoc analysis of hospital admissions following an induced abortion and ER visit within 30 days: 4273 following surgical abortion and 408 following chemical abortion; abortion not miscoded versus miscoded or concealed at prior ER visit. Results: Chemical abortion patients whose abortions are misclassified as miscarriages during an ER visit subsequently experience on average 3.2 hospital admissions within 30 days. 86% of the patients ultimately have surgical removal of retained products of conception (RPOC). Chemical abortions are more likely than surgical abortions (OR 1.80, CL 1.38-2.35) to result in an RPOC admission, and chemical abortions concealed are more likely to result (OR 2.18, CL 1.65-2.88) in a subsequent RPOC admission than abortions without miscoding. Surgical abortions miscoded/concealed are similarly twice as likely to result in hospital admission than those without miscoding. Conclusion: Patient concealment and/or physician failure to identify a prior abortion during an ER visit is a significant risk factor for a subsequent hospital admission. Patients and ER personnel should be made aware of this risk.

Indexed as

emergency roominduced abortioninpatient admissionmedicaidmedical abortionretained products of conception

Identifiers

PMID35633832
PMCPMC9130799
OpenAlexW4282918715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.