Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Possible Effects of Bright Light Therapy on Electroencephalogram-Vigilance in the Treatment of Depression in Adolescents: A Pilot Study.

Christoph Berger, Alexander Dück, Stephanie Gest, Lena Jonas, Michael Kölch, Franziska Martin, Olaf Reis, Jennifer Schroth, Tanja Legenbauer, Martin Holtmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph BergerDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Neurology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Alexander DückDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Neurology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Stephanie GestLandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe (LWL) University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Lena JonasDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Neurology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Michael KölchDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Neurology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Franziska MartinLandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe (LWL) University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Olaf ReisDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Neurology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Jennifer SchrothDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Tanja LegenbauerLandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe (LWL) University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Martin HoltmannLandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe (LWL) University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
University of Rostock · DELandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe · DEKlinikum Brandenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronotherapeutic treatments for depression, such as bright light therapy (BLT), are non-invasive and produce almost no side effects. However, study evidence for reliable neurobiological changes associated with treatment response is still rare. Several studies using EEG-vigilance indicate higher arousal and a later decline during resting state in adult depressive patients compared to healthy controls. To our knowledge, there are no study reports on EEG-vigilance in depressive youth to date. Methods: A total of 11 adolescents with depression receiving BLT were compared to 11 age and gender-matched patients with depression receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The BLT was administered in the morning for 2 weeks on five consecutive days per week. The depressive symptomatology was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the resting state electroencephalogram (EEG) of 20 min was recorded. EEG and BDI-II were assessed before and after 10 days of treatment. Vigilance level and vigilance decline were estimated using the VIGALL toolbox. Results: Brain arousal increased after 10 days of bright light therapy in adolescents with depression. Severe depressive symptoms were associated with higher brain arousal levels; the BDI-II sum score correlated negatively with the amount of drowsiness. Limitations: The sample size was small and participants' brain arousal at baseline was not matched and differed between BLT and TAU groups. Conclusion: The BLT might have an additional effect on brain arousal. EEG-vigilance seems to be a reliable and valid marker for neurobiological changes that are probably associated with depression and its treatment and, therefore, might be of clinical relevance.

Indexed as

BLTbright-light-therapydepressionVIGALLvigilance

Identifiers

PMID35633803
PMCPMC9133446
OpenAlexW4280589000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.