Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633780›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Catatonia Spectrum: Validation of a Questionnaire Investigating Catatonia Spectrum.

Liliana Dell'Osso, Giulia Amatori, Andrea Cappelli, Ivan Mirko Cremone, Gabriele Massimetti, Davide Gravina, Benedetta Nardi, Francesca Benedetti, Ilaria Chiarantini, Mario Luciano and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Investigating the relationship between autistic traits and symptoms and Catatonia Spectrum.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
  17. Paralyzed by Fear?-A Case Report in the Context of Narrative Review on Catatonia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Liliana Dell'OssoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giulia AmatoriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea CappelliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ivan Mirko CremoneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriele MassimettiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Davide GravinaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Benedetta NardiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca BenedettiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ilaria ChiarantiniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Mario LucianoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
Isabella BerardelliDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs, University of Roma "La Sapienza," Roma, Italy.
Natascia BrondinoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Marianna De GregorioDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giacomo DesteDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marta NolaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Antonino ReitanoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maria Rosaria Anna MuscatelloDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maurizio PompiliDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs, University of Roma "La Sapienza," Roma, Italy.
Pierluigi PolitiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Antonio VitaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Claudia CarmassiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Mario MajDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: A growing body of literature has demonstrated the utility of a dimensional perspective on mental disorders. The current study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the Catatonia Spectrum (CS), a new questionnaire specifically tailored to assess the spectrum of catatonia, from full blown forms to subthreshold ones. Methods: 86 adults with at least three symptom criteria for catatonia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), 81 adults affected by borderline personality disorder (BPD), 104 adults with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), and 105 subjects without mental disorders (CTL), were recruited from six Italian University Departments of Psychiatry and administered the: Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI), and CS. Results: CS scale demonstrated a high level of internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability for total and domain scores. CS domain scores were positively and significantly correlated with each other ( Conclusion: The CS showed excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability and strong convergent validity with alternative dimensional measures of catatonia. The questionnaire performed differently across the four diagnostic groups, with an increasing score gradient from healthy controls to patients with MDD, BPD and up to the catatonia group.

Indexed as

catatoniaCatatonia Rating Scaledimensional psychiatrypsychometric instrumentvalidation questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID35633780
PMCPMC9133529
OpenAlexW4280574906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.