Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Intercropping Pinto Peanut in Litchi Orchard Effectively Improved Soil Available Potassium Content, Optimized Soil Bacterial Community Structure, and Advanced Bacterial Community Diversity.

Ya Zhao, Caibin Yan, Fuchu Hu, Zhiwen Luo, Shiqing Zhang, Min Xiao, Zhe Chen, Hongyan Fan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ya ZhaoKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Caibin YanKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Fuchu HuKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Zhiwen LuoKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Shiqing ZhangKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Min XiaoKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Zhe ChenKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Hongyan FanKey Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology of Hainan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Haikou Tropical Fruit Tree Scientific Observation and Experimental Station, Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China.
Haikou Experimental Station · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercropping is widely used in agricultural production due to its capability of raising land productivity and providing an opportunity to achieve sustainable intensification of agriculture. In this study, soil samples from 10 to 20 cm depth of intercropping Pinto peanut in litchi orchard and litchi monoculture mode were established to determine soil attributes, enzyme activities, as well as the effect on soil bacterial diversity. On this basis, 16S rRNA V4-V5 region of soil bacterial communities in litchi/Pinto peanut intercropping (LP) mode and litchi monoculture mode (CK) was detected by the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform. The results showed that the content of available potassium (AK) in LP was significantly higher than that in CK by 138.9%, and the content of available nitrogen (AN) in LP was significantly lower than that in CK by 19.6%. The soil enzyme activities were higher in LP as a whole, especially sucrase (SC) and acid protease (PT) were significantly higher by 154.4 and 76.5%, respectively. The absolute abundance and alpha diversity of soil microbiota were significantly higher in the intercropping group. Most importantly, endemic species with a significant difference in LP was higher by ~60 times compared to CK treatment. In the aspect of soil bacterial community structure, the dominant phyla of the two groups were

Indexed as

intercropping Pinto peanut in litchisoil bacterial community structuresoil bacterial diversitysoil enzyme activitysoil properties

Identifiers

PMID35633708
PMCPMC9134032
OpenAlexW4280636611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.