ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Bullseye EVD: preclinical evaluation of an intra-procedural system to confirm external ventricular drainage catheter positioning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Accuracy of 4 Conventional Freehand Frontal Ventriculostomy Methods in the Chinese Population.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2024Article
- Accuracy, Hemorrhagic Complications and CT Radiation Dose of Emergency External Ventricular Drain (EVD) Placement in Pediatric Patients: A 15-Year Retrospective Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeExternal ventricular drainage (EVD) is a life-saving procedure indicated for elevated intracranial pressure. A catheter is inserted into the ventricles to drain cerebrospinal fluid and release the pressure on the brain. However, the standard freehand EVD technique results in catheter malpositioning in up to 60.1% of procedures. This proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate the registration accuracy of a novel image-based verification system "Bullseye EVD" in a preclinical cadaveric model of catheter placement.
methodsExperimentation was performed on both sides of 3 cadaveric heads (n = 6). After a pre-interventional CT scan, a guidewire simulating the EVD catheter was inserted as in a clinical EVD procedure. 3D structured light images (Einscan, Shining 3D, China) were acquired of an optical tracker placed over the guidewire on the surface of the scalp, along with three distinct cranial regions (scalp, face, and ear). A computer vision algorithm was employed to determine the guidewire position based on the pre-interventional CT scan and the intra-procedural optical imaging. A post-interventional CT scan was used to validate the performance of the Bullseye optical imaging system in terms of trajectory and offset errors.
resultsOptical images which combined facial features and exposed scalp within the surgical field resulted in the lowest trajectory and offset errors of 1.28° ± 0.38° and 0.33 ± 0.19 mm, respectively. Mean duration of the optical imaging procedure was 128 ± 35 s.
conclusionsThe Bullseye EVD system presents an accurate patient-specific method to verify freehand EVD positioning. Use of facial features was critical to registration accuracy. Workflow automation and development of a user interface must be considered for future clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.