ReviewAnnals of intensive care2022
Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Timing of Preload Responsiveness in Sepsis and Septic Shock
Effects of Fluid Resuscitation on Capillary Refilling Time and Organ Functions in Septic Shock
Use of Heart-lung Interaction Parameters to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room
Dynamic Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness and Venous Congestion: Evolution of the VExUS Score During Volume Expansion
Prediction of Intradialytic Hypotension at the Initiation of Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration Using Multimodal Ultrasonographic and Hemodynamic Parameters in Intensive Care Unit Patients
VEXUS-REA : Evaluation of Ultrasound Parameters of Venous Congestion in Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.
- Context-specific clinical applicability of the end-expiratory occlusion test to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of anaesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Superior vena cava collapsibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Does tidal volume challenge improve the feasibility of pulse pressure variation in patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of anaesthesia strategies on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomised controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Trial
- The increase in cardiac output induced by a decrease in positive end-expiratory pressure reliably detects volume responsiveness: the PEEP-test study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Carotid flow time: a new surrogate for fluid responsiveness?Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Integrated haemodynamic monitoring of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance in critical care: from physiology to bedside applications.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Venous dimension of shock: Integrating arterial inflow and venous back-pressure in hemodynamic assessment.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle: Updated Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Respiratory variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity combined with tidal volume challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness of lung-protective ventilation patients: a feasibility study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Twenty-five years of septic shock hemodynamic resuscitation trials: a conceptual perspective.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- The usual suspects: a pragmatic framework to identify and address reversible contributors in apparent refractory septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Current and future strategies aiming at reducing catecholamine exposure in septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Exploratory clinical trial on the acoustic variability index for predicting fluid responsiveness during hepatectomy.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Comparison of the change in carotid corrected flow time and stroke volume variation for assessing volume responsiveness in general anesthesia patients: a prospective, observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Less-Invasive Hemodynamic and Tissue Perfusion Monitoring in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Changes in COJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Microcirculation Monitoring in Septic Shock: Focused Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound of the inferior vena cava for fluid therapy decisions: Strengths, limitations, and an integrated approach.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the administration of fluid is the first treatment considered in almost all cases of circulatory failure, this therapeutic option poses two essential problems: the increase in cardiac output induced by a bolus of fluid is inconstant, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload are now clearly demonstrated. This is why many tests and indices have been developed to detect preload dependence and predict fluid responsiveness. In this review, we take stock of the data published in the field over the past three years. Regarding the passive leg raising test, we detail the different stroke volume surrogates that have recently been described to measure its effects using minimally invasive and easily accessible methods. We review the limits of the test, especially in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Regarding the end-expiratory occlusion test, we also present recent investigations that have sought to measure its effects without an invasive measurement of cardiac output. Although the limits of interpretation of the respiratory variation of pulse pressure and of the diameter of the vena cava during mechanical ventilation are now well known, several recent studies have shown how changes in pulse pressure variation itself during other tests reflect simultaneous changes in cardiac output, allowing these tests to be carried out without its direct measurement. This is particularly the case during the tidal volume challenge, a relatively recent test whose reliability is increasingly well established. The mini-fluid challenge has the advantage of being easy to perform, but it requires direct measurement of cardiac output, like the classic fluid challenge. Initially described with echocardiography, recent studies have investigated other means of judging its effects. We highlight the problem of their precision, which is necessary to evidence small changes in cardiac output. Finally, we point out other tests that have appeared more recently, such as the Trendelenburg manoeuvre, a potentially interesting alternative for patients in the prone position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.