ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022
Typing of semen-containing mixtures using ARMS-based semen-specific CpG-InDel/STR markers.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel 16-plex DIP-SNP panel for forensic analysis of imbalanced DNA mixtures in a Han Chinese population.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-assisted analysis of saliva-containing mixtures using a saliva-specific multi-CpG-microhaplotype marker system.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Linking STRs/SNPs and DNA methylation using massively parallel sequencing for potential forensic applications.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Application of a new composite genetic marker semen-specific methylation-microhaplotype in the analysis of semen-vaginal fluid mixtures.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Development of a novel panel for blood identification based on blood-specific CpG-linked SNP markers.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mixed traces are common biological materials found at crime scenes, and their identification remains a significant challenge in the field of forensic genetics. In recent years, DNA methylation has been considered as a promising approach for body fluid identification, and length polymorphic loci are still the preferred markers for personal identification. In this study, we used tissue-specific CpG sites with linked insertion or deletion (InDel) or short tandem repeat (STR) markers (CpG-InDel/STR) for both body fluid and individual identification. The tissue-specific CpG loci, which were all selected from the previous reports, were analyzed using a combination of bisulfite conversion and amplification refractory mutation system-multiprimer-PCR technology. InDels or STRs, which were selected within 400 bp upstream or downstream of the semen-specific CpG loci, were analyzed using a capillary electrophoresis platform. Eventually, we successfully constructed a panel containing 17 semen-specific CpG-InDel/STR compound markers compassing 21 InDels/STRs, 3 body-fluid positive controls (vaginal secretion-, saliva-, and blood-specific CpG), and 1 gender identification locus. Using this panel, full genotyping of individuals could be obtained successfully with 50 ng DNA input. Semen stains stored at room temperature for 7 months and degraded samples that were heat treated for up to 6 h were still identified efficiently. For semen containing mixed stains, it is also useful when the semen content is as low as 3.03%. Moreover, the cumulative discrimination power of this panel is 0.9999998. In conclusion, it is a robust panel enabling the validation of both the tissue source and individual identification of semen containing mixed stains and can be employed as an alternative solution for forensic case investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.