Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633244›Full record

ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2022

Postoperative Surgical Site Infections in the Department of General Surgery of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Pradeep Ghimire, Binod Bade Shrestha, Om Bahadur Karki, Bishowdeep Timilsina, Ananda Neupane, Aprajita Bhandari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pradeep GhimireDepartment of General Surgery, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Fulbari-11, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal.
Binod Bade ShresthaDepartment of General Surgery, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Fulbari-11, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal.
Om Bahadur KarkiDepartment of General Surgery, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Fulbari-11, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal.
Bishowdeep TimilsinaDepartment of General Surgery, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Fulbari-11, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal.
Ananda NeupaneDepartment of General Surgery, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Fulbari-11, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal.
Aprajita BhandariDepartment of General Surgery, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Fulbari-11, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infection is defined by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention as a wound infection that occurs within 30 days of an operative procedure or within a year if an implant is left in place and the infection is thought to be secondary to surgery. It occupies 20% to 39% of all the infections acquired in hospitals. The aim of this study is to find out the prevalence of postoperative surgical site infections in the Department of General Surgery of a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study on a total of 384 post-operative patients of abdominal surgery was conducted in the Department of General Surgery of a tertiary care centre from August 1, 2020 to July 30, 2021 with ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 267). Convenience sampling was done. Post-operative patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.0. Point estimate was done at a 95% Confidence Interval along with frequency and percentages for binary data and mean with standard deviation for continuous data. Results: Among 384 patients, the prevalence of surgical site infection was found to be 65 (16.92%) (13.15-20.65 at a 95% Confidence Interval). The patients had a mean age of 42.06±21.92 years. Conclusions: The prevalence of surgical site infection was higher in our study in comparison to other similar studies conducted in similar settings. Keywords: cross-sectional studies; prevalence; surgical wound infection.

Indexed as

Surgical Wound InfectionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPrevalenceTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35633244
PMCPMC9252227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.