ArticleNursing open2022
A comparative study of patient safety in the intensive care units.
Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the intra-hospital transport safety scale in intensive care.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Construction and content validation of a checklist for effective communication of nursing care to newborns.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Article
- Relationships between job satisfaction, occupational burnout and rationing of care among intensive care unit nurses.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Determining the psychometric properties of safety attitudes questionnaire in NICUs.BMC psychology · 2023Article
- Article
- Patient safety culture in neonatal intensive care units: A qualitative content analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Assessment of procrastination in providing nursing care among Iranian nursing staff.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- A comparative study of patient safety in the intensive care units.Nursing open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to assess patient-safety principles in ICUs.
designThis is a descriptive-comparative study.
methodsThe research environment includes ICUs of hospitals affiliated to the two universities of medical sciences in Tehran. Sampling was done by census using Time and Event Sampling methods. Research instrument was "Patient Safety Principles Checklist". Data analysis was performed using SPSS-20 and descriptive-inferential statistics with a significance level of 0.05.
resultsThere is no significant difference (p-value = .15) in the level of observance of patient-safety principles in two university-affiliated hospitals A (133.26 ± 9.14) and B (128.16 ± 18.01). Evaluation of the mean scores obtained in each dimension and in each of the ICUs was showed that only in dimension No.3 the difference was significant (F[68,2] = 5.20, p-value = .008) and in the AICUs (16.13 ± 1.8) (p-value = .04), it was significantly lower than other ICUs. Identifying risk factors for the patient's immunity reduces the side effects of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.