Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35633065›Full record

ArticleThe journal of vascular access2024

The SIP protocol update: Eight strategies, incorporating Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment (RaPeVA), to minimize complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheter insertion.

Fabrizio Brescia, Mauro Pittiruti, Timothy R Spencer, Robert B Dawson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of vascular access, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07519304 (Effectiveness of a Needle-free Connector With Anti-reflux Technology in Reducing Complications From Long Peripheral Venous Catheters in Hospitalised Adult Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
34.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07519304 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Needle-free Connector With Anti-reflux Technology in Reducing Complications From Long Peripheral Venous Catheters in Hospitalised Adult Patients: Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Arnau de VilanovaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled62ConditionsVascular Access Devices, Catheters, Occlusion, ThrombosisArmsNeedle-free connector with neutral fluid displacement and without anti-reflux technology, Needle-free connector with neutral fluid displacement and equipped with anti-reflux technology, Long peripheral venous catheter, Ultrasound scanner
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabrizio BresciaUnit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-474X
Mauro PittirutiDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A.Gemelli," IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2225-7654
Timothy R SpencerGlobal Vascular Access, LLC, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3128-2034
Robert B DawsonHospital Medicine and Vascular Access, Catholic Medical Center - Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital, Colebrook, NH, USA.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCatholic Medical Center · USCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) is potentially associated with the risk of immediate/early adverse events, some of them minimal (repeated punctures) and some relevant (accidental arterial puncture or nerve-related injury). Several strategies adopted during the insertion process may minimize the risk of such events, including late complication risks such as infection, venous thrombosis, or catheter dislodgment and/or malposition. This paper describes an update version of the SIP protocol (Safe Insertion of PICCs), an insertion bundle which includes eight effective strategies that aims to minimize immediate, early, or late insertion-associated complications. These strategies include: preprocedural ultrasound assessment utilizing the RaPeVA (Rapid Peripheral Venous Assessment) protocol; appropriate skin antiseptic technique; choice of appropriate vein, adoption of the Zone Insertion Method™; clear identification of the median nerve and brachial artery; ultrasound-guided puncture; ultrasound-guided tip navigation; intra-procedural assessment of tip location; correct securement of the catheter, and appropriate protection of the exit site. This updated version of the SIP protocol includes several novelties based on the most recent evidence-based scientific literature on PICC insertion, such as the clinical relevance of the tunneling technique, the use of ultrasound for intra-procedural tip navigation and tip location, and the new technologies for the protection of the exit site (cyanoacrylate glue) and for the securement of the catheter (subcutaneous anchorage).

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersVenous ThrombosisCatheters, IndwellingHumansVeinscentral venous catheterizationpatient safetyperipherally inserted central cathetersperipheral venous catheterizationstandardized assessmentTechniques and proceduresultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID35633065
PMCPMC10845830
OpenAlexW4281630589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.