ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022
Systemic hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Pooled it
- Are natural estrogens used in contraception at lower risk of venous thromboembolism than synthetic ones? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Combined oral contraceptive pill compared with no medical treatment in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review.Clinical endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Ethinylestradiol in combined hormonal contraceptive has a broader effect on serum proteome compared with estradiol valerate: a randomized controlled trial.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Trial
- Combined oral contraceptives containing estradiol valerate vs ethinylestradiol on coagulation: A randomized clinical trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Trial
- Efficacy and safety of desogestrel/ethinylestradiol 150/20 flexible extended regimen (FREEDOM 150/20) in dysmenorrhea: phase 3 study in Japan.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Hormonal therapy and cardiovascular risk in polycystic ovary syndrome: a propensity-matched cohort study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Acute coronary syndromes across the lifespan of women.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Prescribed hormonal contraceptive use trends in the Estonian Biobank: A longitudinal observational study.PLoS medicine · 2026Observational
- Cardiovascular Safety of Hormonal Contraception: Method-Specific Risks and Clinical Implications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Medical Treatment for Endometriosis: One Size Does Not Fit All.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Contraceptives in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): a narrative review.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Between contraception and hormones: a qualitative analysis of the lived experiences of former contraceptive pill users.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional and longitudinal metabolomics-based profiles associated with oral contraceptive and progestin-only pill use: A Finnish population-based study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Behind the Headache: A Case of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Associated With Hormonal Contraceptive Use.Cureus · 2025Article
- Moderate Associations Between the Use of Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine Device and Metabolomics Profile.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Associated With Progestin-Only Contraceptive Implant Use.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2025Article
- A comparison of the knowledge of hormonal contraception between women living in urban and rural areas of Poland.PloS one · 2025Article
- Anticoagulant prescribing trends, bleeding events, and reversal agent use in pediatric patients: A retrospective, real-world study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Chapter 3. Impact of estrogens on hemostasis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe increased risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of hormonal contraception is well recognized, but evidence regarding hormonal contraception containing natural estradiol is limited. This study aimed to assess the associations between the patterns of use of different systemic hormonal contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism during 2017-2019. MATERIAL AND
methodsAll fertile-aged women (15-49 years) living in Finland in 2017 and using hormonal contraception in 2017 and their 1:1 age- and residence-matched controls not using hormonal contraception in 2017 (altogether 587 559 women) were selected from the Prescription Centre. All incident venous thromboembolism cases during 2018-2019 and their 4:1 age-matched controls were further analyzed in a prospective nested case-control design to assess the associations between the use (starting, stopping, continuous vs no use) of different hormonal contraception types and venous thromboembolism.
resultsAltogether, 1334 venous thromboembolism cases occurred during the follow-up period (incidence rate 1.14 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.20), with an incidence rate ratio of hormonal contraception vs no hormonal contraception use of 1.42 (95% CI 1.27-1.58). Compared with non-use, starting the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.62-5.03), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 0.98-2.44), desogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.97; 95% CI 0.99-3.92), and transdermal patch releasing norelgestromin and ethinylestradiol (aOR 5.10; 95% CI 1.12-23.16), as well as continuing the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (aOR 2.60; 95% CI 1.61-4.21), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 1.02-2.37), cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.06-2.61), and vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 3.27; 95% CI 1.95-5.48) were associated with venous thromboembolism risk. Regarding the type of estrogen, the highest risk was associated with current use (vs non use in the previous 180 days) of ethinylestradiol-containing preparations (aOR 2.20; 95% CI 1.82-2.65), followed by estradiol-containing preparations (aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.04-1.87) with no risk for progestin-only hormonal contraception. Current use of estradiol-containing preparations was not associated with venous thromboembolism risk after exclusion of cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.66-1.66).
conclusionsAn increased risk of venous thromboembolism is associated with ethinylestradiol-containing combined preparations. The use of estradiol-containing combined preparations confers only a slightly increased risk, possibly driven by cyproterone-containing combined oral contraceptives, whereas the use of progestin-only contraception is not associated with venous thromboembolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.