Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632793›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Effect of Relative Humidity on Transfer of Aerosol-Deposited Artificial and Human Saliva from Surfaces to Artificial Finger-Pads.

Maurice D Walker, Jack C Vincent, Lee Benson, Corinne A Stone, Guy Harris, Rachael E Ambler, Pat Watts, Tom Slatter, Martín López-García, Marco-Felipe King and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A COVID-19 Outbreak in a Large Meat-Processing Plant in England: Transmission Risk Factors and Controls.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maurice D WalkerDefence Science Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.
Jack C VincentDefence Science Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.
Lee BensonSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2874-037X
Corinne A StoneDefence Science Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.
Guy HarrisDefence Science Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.
Rachael E AmblerDefence Science Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.
Pat WattsDefence Science Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.
Tom SlatterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0485-4615
Martín López-GarcíaDepartment of Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-8595
Marco-Felipe KingSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7010-476X
Catherine J NoakesSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Richard J ThomasDefence Science Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4938-8491
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface to hand transfer of viruses represents a potential mechanism for human exposure. An experimental process for evaluating the touch transfer of aerosol-deposited material is described based on controlling surface, tribological, and soft matter components of the transfer process. A range of high-touch surfaces were evaluated. Under standardized touch parameters (15 N, 1 s), relative humidity (RH) of the atmosphere around the contact transfer event significantly influenced transfer of material to the finger-pad. At RH < 40%, transfer from all surfaces was <10%. Transfer efficiency increased markedly as RH increased, reaching a maximum of approximately 50%. The quantity of material transferred at specific RHs above 40% was also dependent on roughness of the surface material and the properties of the aerosol-deposited material. Smooth surfaces, such as melamine and stainless steel, generated higher transfer efficiencies compared to those with textured roughness, such as ABS pinseal and KYDEX® plastics. Pooled human saliva was transferred at a lower rate compared to artificial saliva, indicating the role of rheological properties. The artificial saliva data were modeled by non-linear regression and the impact of environmental humidity and temperature were evaluated within a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment model using SARS-CoV-2 as an example. This illustrated that the trade-off between transfer efficiency and virus survival may lead to the highest risks of fomite transmissions in indoor environments with higher humidity.

Indexed as

COVID-19VirusesAerosolsHumansHumiditySalivaSaliva, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2AerosolsSaliva, Artificialgastrointestinalrespiratorysalivasurfacetouchtransfervirus

Identifiers

PMID35632793
PMCPMC9146372
OpenAlexW4280549480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.