Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632545›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Two-Tailed Dogs, Social Unrest and COVID-19 Vaccination: Politics, Hesitancy and Vaccine Choice in Hungary and Thailand.

Robin Goodwin, Lan Anh Nguyen Luu, Juthatip Wiwattanapantuwong, Mónika Kovács, Panrapee Suttiwan, Yafit Levin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Robin GoodwinFaculty of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2407-7016
Lan Anh Nguyen LuuInstitute of Intercultural Psychology and Education, Eötvös Loránd University, 1075 Budapest, Hungary.
Juthatip WiwattanapantuwongFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4527-5070
Mónika KovácsInstitute of Intercultural Psychology and Education, Eötvös Loránd University, 1075 Budapest, Hungary.
Panrapee SuttiwanFaculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Yafit LevinDepartment of Social Work and Education, Ariel University, Ariel 4076414, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-6569
Chulalongkorn University · THEötvös Loránd University · HUAriel University · ILUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

National Excellence Programme 2018-1.2.1-NKP-2018-00006Ratchadapiseksompotch fund RCU_H_64_001_38
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA long tradition of research has shown an association between political orientation and vaccine uptake. However, we know little about political preferences and the choice of specific vaccines.

methodsWe conducted two national surveys, in Hungary (Study 1, online,

resultsIn Hungary, those supporting the government or on the political right were more willing to be vaccinated, with this association strongest for government approved vaccines. These respondents were also more likely to accept Chinese and Russian vaccines and reject the Moderna vaccine. In Thailand, vaccinated respondents reported greater trust in the government, with preference for AstraZeneca associated with support for pro-government political parties and preference for Pfizer with anti-government attitudes.

conclusionsVaccine campaigns need to recognise the role of political loyalties not only in vaccine willingness, but in vaccine choice, especially given the mixing of vaccines across doses.

Indexed as

cultureHungarypoliticsThailandvaccines

Identifiers

PMID35632545
PMCPMC9147869
OpenAlexW4280614548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.