Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632537›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Citizen Stance towards Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination and Vaccine Booster Doses: A Study in Colombia, El Salvador and Spain.

Isabel Iguacel, Juan Pablo Álvarez-Najar, Patricia Del Carmen Vásquez, Judith Alarcón, María Ángeles Orte, Eva Samatán, Begoña Martínez-Jarreta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel IguacelFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4242-5464
Juan Pablo Álvarez-NajarFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0875-9244
Patricia Del Carmen VásquezFaculty of Medicine, University of El Salvador, 2511-200 San Salvador, El Salvador.
Judith AlarcónFaculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
María Ángeles OrteFaculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Eva SamatánFaculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Begoña Martínez-JarretaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-9189
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of El Salvador · SV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The infections and deaths resulting from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggered the need for some governments to make COVID-19 vaccines mandatory. The present study aims to analyze the position of 3026 adults in Colombia, El Salvador, and Spain regarding the possibility of making COVID-19 vaccine mandatory and the intention to be vaccinated with the booster or possible successive doses. Data from an online survey conducted from August to December 2021 among a non-representative sample of Spanish-speaking countries were collected. Multinomial Logistic Regression Models were used. A total of 77.4% of Colombians were in favor of mandatory vaccination compared to 71.5% of Salvadorians and 65.4% of Spaniards (p < 0.000). Women and people over 65 years of age were the groups most in favor of making the vaccine mandatory (p < 0.000). A total of 79.4% said they had received a third dose or would intend to receive the third dose or future doses, if necessary, compared with 9.4% who expressed doubts and 9.9% who refused to be vaccinated or did not intend to be vaccinated. Among the measures that could be taken to motivate vaccination, 63.0% and 60.6% were in favor of requiring a negative test to enter any place of leisure or work, respectively, compared to 16.2% in favor of suspension from work without pay. The acceptance of mandatory vaccination and of third or future doses varies greatly according to sociodemographic characteristics and work environment. As such, it is recommended that policy makers adapt public health strategies accordingly.

Indexed as

attitudesboostermandatory vaccinationSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35632537
PMCPMC9147164
OpenAlexW4280521797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.