Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632486›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Governmental Incentives, Satisfaction with Health Promotional Materials, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Random Telephone Survey.

Zixin Wang, Yuan Fang, Fuk-Yuen Yu, Paul Shing-Fong Chan, Siyu Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zixin WangJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1158-2304
Yuan FangDepartment of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-5076
Fuk-Yuen YuJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-0281
Paul Shing-Fong ChanJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6916-4957
Siyu ChenJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6271-1858
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKEducation University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 19181152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccination is proven to be effective and safe for older adults. This study investigated the impacts of incentives and health promotional materials provided by the government on the completion of the primary COVID-19 vaccination series among older adults in Hong Kong. Participants were Chinese-speaking community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years. Telephone numbers were randomly selected from up-to-date Hong Kong telephone directories. A total of 440 participants completed the telephone interview. Logistic regression models were fitted. Among the participants, 58.4% had completed the primary COVID-19 vaccination series. Most participants believed that incentives provided by the government had almost no impact on increasing their motivation to receive COVID-19 vaccination, and less than half thought that vaccination promotional materials produced by the government could address their concerns and help them make decisions. After adjustment for significant background characteristics, we found perceived higher impacts of the incentives and belief that vaccination promotional materials produced by the government could address their concern and were helpful for them to make decisions to be associated with a higher rate of completion of primary COVID-19 vaccination series. Perceptions supporting COVID-19 vaccination and less decisional conflict regarding the choice of vaccine were also positively associated with the dependent variable. Government should develop incentives and health promotional materials tailored to the needs of older adults.

Indexed as

ChinaCOVID-19 vaccination uptakedecisional conflictshealth promotional materialsincentivesolder adultsperceptions

Identifiers

PMID35632486
PMCPMC9147504
OpenAlexW4229364946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.