Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632485›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Development and Testing of a Low-Cost Inactivation Buffer That Allows for Direct SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Saliva.

Brandon Bustos-Garcia, Sylvia Garza-Manero, Nallely Cano-Dominguez, Dulce Maria Lopez-Sanchez, Gonzalo Salgado-Montes de Oca, Alfonso Salgado-Aguayo, Felix Recillas-Targa, Santiago Avila-Rios, Victor Julian Valdes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandon Bustos-GarciaDepartment of Cell Biology and Development, Institute of Cellular Physiology (IFC), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6823-7392
Sylvia Garza-ManeroDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Cellular Physiology (IFC), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Nallely Cano-DominguezDepartment of Cell Biology and Development, Institute of Cellular Physiology (IFC), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Dulce Maria Lopez-SanchezCentre for Research in Infectious Diseases of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (CIENI/INER), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7318-0618
Gonzalo Salgado-Montes de OcaCentre for Research in Infectious Diseases of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (CIENI/INER), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Alfonso Salgado-AguayoLaboratory of Research in Rheumatic Diseases, National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (INER), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8102-3690
Felix Recillas-TargaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Cellular Physiology (IFC), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Santiago Avila-RiosCentre for Research in Infectious Diseases of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (CIENI/INER), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Victor Julian ValdesDepartment of Cell Biology and Development, Institute of Cellular Physiology (IFC), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6157-1358
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 1005898Secretaría de Educación, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SECTEI, CDMX) SECTEI/277/219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massive testing is a cornerstone in efforts to effectively track infections and stop COVID-19 transmission, including places with good vaccination coverage. However, SARS-CoV-2 testing by RT-qPCR requires specialized personnel, protection equipment, commercial kits, and dedicated facilities, which represent significant challenges for massive testing in resource-limited settings. It is therefore important to develop testing protocols that are inexpensive, fast, and sufficiently sensitive. Here, we optimized the composition of a buffer (PKTP), containing a protease, a detergent, and an RNase inhibitor, which is compatible with the RT-qPCR chemistry, allowing for direct SARS-CoV-2 detection from saliva without extracting RNA. PKTP is compatible with heat inactivation, reducing the biohazard risk of handling samples. We assessed the PKTP buffer performance in comparison to the RNA-extraction-based protocol of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in saliva samples from 70 COVID-19 patients finding a good sensitivity (85.7% for the N1 and 87.1% for the N2 target) and correlations (R = 0.77, p < 0.001 for N1, and R = 0.78, p < 0.001 for N2). We also propose an auto-collection protocol for saliva samples and a multiplex reaction to minimize the PCR reaction number per patient and further reduce costs and processing time of several samples, while maintaining diagnostic standards in favor of massive testing.

Indexed as

COVID-19 testingdirect RT-qPCRsalivaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35632485
PMCPMC9143422
OpenAlexW4229368512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.