Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632467›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Complete (Humoral and Cellular) Response to Vaccination against COVID-19 in a Group of Healthcare Workers-Assessment of Factors Affecting Immunogenicity.

Ewa Morgiel, Magdalena Szmyrka, Marta Madej, Agata Sebastian, Renata Sokolik, Iga Andrasiak, Maria Chodyra, Małgorzata Walas-Antoszek, Lucyna Korman, Jerzy Świerkot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ewa MorgielDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Magdalena SzmyrkaDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Marta MadejDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Agata SebastianDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Renata SokolikDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9866-2066
Iga AndrasiakIndependent Researcher, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Maria ChodyraInternal Medicine Department, Town Hospital Bolesławiec, 59-700 Bolesławiec, Poland.
Małgorzata Walas-AntoszekInternal Medicine Department, Town Hospital Bolesławiec, 59-700 Bolesławiec, Poland.
Lucyna KormanDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Jerzy ŚwierkotDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is the best way to limit the extent of the COVID pandemic. Knowledge of the duration of the immune response will allow the planning of a vaccination protocol. This study aims to validate the complete (humoral and cellular) immune responses over time in large population groups following the full vaccination of healthcare professionals in real-life conditions and to assess the relationship between antibody levels and T-cell activity in relation to the characteristics of the study group. The samples for the study were obtained from volunteers (staff of two hospitals) on three occasions: before vaccination, T0, then 4-9 weeks after full vaccination (two doses BNT162b2), T1, and 7-9 months after vaccination, T2. The humoral response was investigated by the titre of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to S1 protein. Assays were performed three times at intervals. The cellular response was assessed in a subgroup of 189 subjects by QuanT-Cell SARS-CoV-2 (IGRA). The assay was performed once. A group of 344 subjects fully vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine were included in the study. The humoral response was observed in 100% of subjects at both 4-7 weeks and 7-9 months, but antibody titres fell by almost 90% in this interval. The cellular response was observed in 94% (177/189) of subjects 7-9 months after the second dose of vaccine. In subjects with a negative cellular response, eight out of 12 smoked. A factor associated with greater immunogenicity of vaccination was past SARS-CoV-2 infection. The administration of full BNT162b2 vaccination (two doses) induces humoral and cellular responses detectable even more than six months after vaccination. Smoking may be a factor associated with impaired cellular response to vaccination.

Indexed as

BNT162b2 3cellular immune response 6COVID-19 2humoral immune response 5SARS-CoV-2 1vaccine 4

Identifiers

PMID35632467
PMCPMC9146884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.