ArticleVaccines2022
Comparison of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Sucrose Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation for the Quantification of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Antigens.
Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus-like Particles Produced inVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Single-Domain Antibodies That Specifically Recognize Intact Capsids of Multiple Foot-and-Mouth Disease Serotype O Strains.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Correlation between 146S Antigen Content in Foot-and-Mouth Disease Inactivated Vaccines and Immunogenicity Level and Vaccine Potency Alternative Test Methods.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Calcium Chloride as a Novel Stabilizer for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus and Its Application in the Vaccine Formulation.Vaccines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) causes substantial economic losses in the livestock industry. The protective immunizing component of the FMD virus (FMDV) is a ribonucleoprotein particle with a sedimentation coefficient of 146S. Size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) was introduced to replace sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation (SDG), which is the gold standard for the quantification of FMDV 146S particles. SE-HPLC showed a pattern similar to that of SDG; however, the two methods resulted in different quantities for the same amount of 146S particles. This study aimed to identify the reason for this disparity and adjust the difference between the two methods by employing a standard material. While SE-HPLC displayed all the virus particles in the peak fraction by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting, the virus particles were widely dispersed in multiple fractions, including peak fractions in the SDG. To adjust the difference between the two methods, a stable surrogate virus, bovine enterovirus, was devised to draw a standard curve, and the gap was reduced to <10%. To our knowledge, this is the first report to provide experimental evidence on the difference between SDG and SE-HPLC for the quantification of FMDV particles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.