Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632284›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Design of Proactive Interaction for In-Vehicle Robots Based on Transparency.

Jianmin Wang, Tianyang Yue, Yujia Liu, Yuxi Wang, Chengji Wang, Fei Yan, Fang You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianmin WangCar Interaction Design Lab, College of Arts and Media, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Tianyang YueCar Interaction Design Lab, College of Arts and Media, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Yujia LiuCar Interaction Design Lab, College of Arts and Media, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6529-1185
Yuxi WangCar Interaction Design Lab, College of Arts and Media, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Chengji WangCar Interaction Design Lab, College of Arts and Media, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Fei YanUlm University, 89081 Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Fang YouCar Interaction Design Lab, College of Arts and Media, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.

Funding

CES-Kingfar Excellent Young Scholar Joint Research Funding 202002JG26China Scholarship Council Foundation 2020-1509Innovative talents of Nanchang "Double Hundred Plan" introduced categoryShenzhen Collaborative Innovation Project: International Science and Technology Cooperation GHZ20190823164803756the National Social Science Fund of China 19FYSB040Tongji University Excellent Experimental Teaching Program 0600104096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the transparency theory, this study investigates the appropriate amount of transparency information expressed by the in-vehicle robot under two channels of voice and visual in a proactive interaction scenario. The experiments are to test and evaluate different transparency levels and combinations of information in different channels of the in-vehicle robot, based on a driving simulator to collect subjective and objective data, which focuses on users' safety, usability, trust, and emotion dimensions under driving conditions. The results show that appropriate transparency expression is able to improve drivers' driving control and subjective evaluation and that drivers need a different amount of transparency information in different types of tasks.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingRoboticsVoiceEmotionsTrustinteraction designin-vehicle robotsproactivitytransparency

Identifiers

PMID35632284
PMCPMC9146175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.