Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632260›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Rapid Detection and Quantification of Adulterants in Fruit Juices Using Machine Learning Tools and Spectroscopy Data.

José Luis P Calle, Marta Barea-Sepúlveda, Ana Ruiz-Rodríguez, José Ángel Álvarez, Marta Ferreiro-González, Miguel Palma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Luis P CalleDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, IVAGRO, CeiA3, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.
Marta Barea-SepúlvedaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, IVAGRO, CeiA3, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.
Ana Ruiz-RodríguezDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, IVAGRO, CeiA3, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8457-8149
José Ángel ÁlvarezDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, INBIO, University of Cadiz, Apartado 40, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.
Marta Ferreiro-GonzálezDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, IVAGRO, CeiA3, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-403X
Miguel PalmaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, IVAGRO, CeiA3, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8509-4226

Funding

Programa Operativo FEDER 2014-2020 PAI-TAN-AT2019-AGROMIS-EC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruit juice production is one of the most important sectors in the beverage industry, and its adulteration by adding cheaper juices is very common. This study presents a methodology based on the combination of machine learning models and near-infrared spectroscopy for the detection and quantification of juice-to-juice adulteration. We evaluated 100% squeezed apple, pineapple, and orange juices, which were adulterated with grape juice at different percentages (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%). The spectroscopic data have been combined with different machine learning tools to develop predictive models for the control of the juice quality. The use of non-supervised techniques, specifically model-based clustering, revealed a grouping trend of the samples depending on the type of juice. The use of supervised techniques such as random forest and linear discriminant analysis models has allowed for the detection of the adulterated samples with an accuracy of 98% in the test set. In addition, a Boruta algorithm was applied which selected 89 variables as significant for adulterant quantification, and support vector regression achieved a regression coefficient of 0.989 and a root mean squared error of 1.683 in the test set. These results show the suitability of the machine learning tools combined with spectroscopic data as a screening method for the quality control of fruit juices. In addition, a prototype application has been developed to share the models with other users and facilitate the detection and quantification of adulteration in juices.

Indexed as

Food QualityFruit and Vegetable JuicesQuality ControlHumansMachine LearningSpectroscopy, Near-Infraredadulterationclassificationfruits juicesmachine learningnear-infrared spectroscopyregression

Identifiers

PMID35632260
PMCPMC9145498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.