Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632235›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Clustering Approach for Detecting Multiple Types of Adversarial Examples.

Seok-Hwan Choi, Tae-U Bahk, Sungyong Ahn, Yoon-Ho Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seok-Hwan ChoiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3590-6024
Tae-U BahkKorea Apparel Testing & Research Institute, Seoul 02579, Korea.
Sungyong AhnSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8289-9595
Yoon-Ho ChoiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-5082

Funding

Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation(IITP) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) No.2019-0-01343The MSIT(Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) support program supervised by the IITP(Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation) IITP-2022-2020-0-01797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With intentional feature perturbations to a deep learning model, the adversary generates an adversarial example to deceive the deep learning model. As an adversarial example has recently been considered in the most severe problem of deep learning technology, its defense methods have been actively studied. Such effective defense methods against adversarial examples are categorized into one of the three architectures: (1) model retraining architecture; (2) input transformation architecture; and (3) adversarial example detection architecture. Especially, defense methods using adversarial example detection architecture have been actively studied. This is because defense methods using adversarial example detection architecture do not make wrong decisions for the legitimate input data while others do. In this paper, we note that current defense methods using adversarial example detection architecture can classify the input data into only either a legitimate one or an adversarial one. That is, the current defense methods using adversarial example detection architecture can only detect the adversarial examples and cannot classify the input data into multiple classes of data, i.e., legitimate input data and various types of adversarial examples. To classify the input data into multiple classes of data while increasing the accuracy of the clustering model, we propose an advanced defense method using adversarial example detection architecture, which extracts the key features from the input data and feeds the extracted features into a clustering model. From the experimental results under various application datasets, we show that the proposed method can detect the adversarial examples while classifying the types of adversarial examples. We also show that the accuracy of the proposed method outperforms the accuracy of recent defense methods using adversarial example detection architecture.

Indexed as

Cluster Analysisadversarial examplesadversarial perturbationclusteringdeep neural networks (DNNs)security

Identifiers

PMID35632235
PMCPMC9146128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.