ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Towards a Non-Contact Method for Identifying Stress Using Remote Photoplethysmography in Academic Environments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance of artificial intelligence models for monitoring psychological stress using noncontact physiological signals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- When is rPPG physiologically valid for stress and workload monitoring? A PRISMA-ScR scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Wearable ECG and PPG for anxiety detection: a translational digital medicine perspective.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Balancing cardiac privacy with quality in video recordings.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Ultra-short-term stress measurement using RGB camera-based remote photoplethysmography with reduced effects of Individual differences in heart rate.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Remote photoplethysmography for health assessment: a review informed by IntelliProve technology.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Advances and challenges in the detection of academic stress and anxiety in the classroom: A literature review and recommendations.Education and information technologies · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stress has become a common condition and is one of the chief causes of university course disenrollment. Most of the studies and tests on academic stress have been conducted in research labs or controlled environments, but these tests can not be extended to a real academic environment due to their complexity. Academic stress presents different associated symptoms, anxiety being one of the most common. This study focuses on anxiety derived from academic activities. This study aims to validate the following hypothesis: by using a non-contact method based on the use of remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), it is possible to identify academic stress levels with an accuracy greater than or equal to that of previous works which used contact methods. rPPG signals from 56 first-year engineering undergraduate students were recorded during an experimental task. The results show that the rPPG signals combined with students' demographic data and psychological scales (the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) improve the accuracy of different classification methods. Moreover, the results demonstrate that the proposed method provides 96% accuracy by using K-nearest neighbors, J48, and random forest classifiers. The performance metrics show better or equal accuracy compared to other contact methods. In general, this study demonstrates that it is possible to implement a low-cost method for identifying academic stress levels in educational environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.