Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632170›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Energy and Distance Based Multi-Objective Red Fox Optimization Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Network.

Rajathi Natarajan, Geetha Megharaj, Adam Marchewka, Parameshachari Bidare Divakarachari, Manoj Raghubir Hans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajathi NatarajanDepartment of Information Technology, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore 641049, India.
Geetha MegharajDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Sri Krishna Institute of Technology, Bangalore 560090, India.
Adam MarchewkaFaculty of Telecommunications, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0651-3208
Parameshachari Bidare DivakarachariDepartment of Telecommunication Engineering, GSSS Institute of Engineering and Technology for Women, Mysuru 570016, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3997-5070
Manoj Raghubir HansDepartment of ECE, School of Engineering, MITADT University, Pune 412201, India.
Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology · PLCentre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics · INJSS Science and Technology University · INMIT World Peace University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern trends, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are interesting, and distributed in the environment to evaluate received data. The sensor nodes have a higher capacity to sense and transmit the information. A WSN contains low-cost, low-power, multi-function sensor nodes, with limited computational capabilities, used for observing environmental constraints. In previous research, many energy-efficient routing methods were suggested to improve the time of the network by minimizing energy consumption; sometimes, the sensor nodes run out of power quickly. The majority of recent articles present various methods aimed at reducing energy usage in sensor networks. In this paper, an energy-efficient clustering/routing technique, called the energy and distance based multi-objective red fox optimization algorithm (ED-MORFO), was proposed to reduce energy consumption. In each communication round of transmission, this technique selects the cluster head (CH) with the most residual energy, and finds the optimal routing to the base station. The simulation clearly shows that the proposed ED-MORFO achieves better performance in terms of energy consumption (0.46 J), packet delivery ratio (99.4%), packet loss rate (0.6%), end-to-end delay (11 s), routing overhead (0.11), throughput (0.99 Mbps), and network lifetime (3719 s), when compared with existing MCH-EOR and RDSAOA-EECP methods.

Indexed as

cluster headenergy consumptionmulti-objective red fox optimizationnetwork lifetimewireless sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID35632170
PMCPMC9144256
OpenAlexW4280495828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.