Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632142›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Energy Efficient Consensus Approach of Blockchain for IoT Networks with Edge Computing.

Shivani Wadhwa, Shalli Rani, Kavita, Sahil Verma, Jana Shafi, Marcin Wozniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shivani WadhwaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab 140401, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0206-369X
Shalli RaniChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab 140401, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-9435
KavitaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5422-1659
Sahil VermaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3136-4029
Jana ShafiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Arts and Science, Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University, Wadi Ad Dawasir 11991, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-670X
Marcin WozniakFaculty of Applied Mathematics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9073-5347

Funding

Silesian University of Technology 09/010/RGJ22/0068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blockchain technology is gaining a lot of attention in various fields, such as intellectual property, finance, smart agriculture, etc. The security features of blockchain have been widely used, integrated with artificial intelligence, Internet of Things (IoT), software defined networks (SDN), etc. The consensus mechanism of blockchain is its core and ultimately affects the performance of the blockchain. In the past few years, many consensus algorithms, such as proof of work (PoW), ripple, proof of stake (PoS), practical byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT), etc., have been designed to improve the performance of the blockchain. However, the high energy requirement, memory utilization, and processing time do not match with our actual desires. This paper proposes the consensus approach on the basis of PoW, where a single miner is selected for mining the task. The mining task is offloaded to the edge networking. The miner is selected on the basis of the digitization of the specifications of the respective machines. The proposed model makes the consensus approach more energy efficient, utilizes less memory, and less processing time. The improvement in energy consumption is approximately 21% and memory utilization is 24%. Efficiency in the block generation rate at the fixed time intervals of 20 min, 40 min, and 60 min was observed.

Indexed as

blockchainconsensusedgeenergyoffloading

Identifiers

PMID35632142
PMCPMC9147960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.