Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632109›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Machine Learning Approach to Support the Detection of Parkinson's Disease in IMU-Based Gait Analysis.

Dante Trabassi, Mariano Serrao, Tiwana Varrecchia, Alberto Ranavolo, Gianluca Coppola, Roberto De Icco, Cristina Tassorelli, Stefano Filippo Castiglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dante TrabassiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4739-3441
Mariano SerraoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.
Tiwana VarrecchiaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy.
Alberto RanavoloDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-6166
Gianluca CoppolaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8510-6925
Roberto De IccoHeadache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-4948
Cristina TassorelliHeadache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1513-2113
Stefano Filippo CastigliaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-5197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine which supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm can most accurately classify people with Parkinson's disease (pwPD) from speed-matched healthy subjects (HS) based on a selected minimum set of IMU-derived gait features. Twenty-two gait features were extrapolated from the trunk acceleration patterns of 81 pwPD and 80 HS, including spatiotemporal, pelvic kinematics, and acceleration-derived gait stability indexes. After a three-level feature selection procedure, seven gait features were considered for implementing five ML algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network, decision trees (DT), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbors. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were calculated. SVM, DT, and RF showed the best classification performances, with prediction accuracy higher than 80% on the test set. The conceptual model of approaching ML that we proposed could reduce the risk of overrepresenting multicollinear gait features in the model, reducing the risk of overfitting in the test performances while fostering the explainability of the results.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisParkinson DiseaseGaitHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector Machineartificial intelligenceartificial neural networkdecision treegait analysisharmonic ratioK-nearest neighborsmachine learningParkinson’s diseaserandom forestsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID35632109
PMCPMC9148133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.