Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632107›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Can the Output of a Learned Classification Model Monitor a Person's Functional Recovery Status Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Jill Emmerzaal, Arne De Brabandere, Rob van der Straaten, Johan Bellemans, Liesbet De Baets, Jesse Davis, Ilse Jonkers, Annick Timmermans, Benedicte Vanwanseele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jill EmmerzaalHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-7604
Arne De BrabandereDeclarative Languages and Artificial Intelligence Group, Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Rob van der StraatenREVAL Rehabilitation Research, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5071-2124
Johan BellemansDepartment of Orthopaedics, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, 3600 Genk, Belgium.
Liesbet De BaetsPain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.
Jesse DavisDeclarative Languages and Artificial Intelligence Group, Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Ilse JonkersHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7611-3747
Annick TimmermansREVAL Rehabilitation Research, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-947X
Benedicte VanwanseeleHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-9483

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders T004716N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a common musculoskeletal disorder. Classification models can discriminate an osteoarthritic gait pattern from that of control subjects. However, whether the output of learned models (probability of belonging to a class) is usable for monitoring a person's functional recovery status post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is largely unexplored. The research question is two-fold: (I) Can a learned classification model's output be used to monitor a person's recovery status post-TKA? (II) Is the output related to patient-reported functioning? We constructed a logistic regression model based on (1) pre-operative IMU-data of level walking, ascending, and descending stairs and (2) 6-week post-operative data of walking, ascending-, and descending stairs. Trained models were deployed on subjects at three, six, and 12 months post-TKA. Patient-reported functioning was assessed by the KOOS-ADL section. We found that the model trained on 6-weeks post-TKA walking data showed a decrease in the probability of belonging to the TKA class over time, with moderate to strong correlations between the model's output and patient-reported functioning. Thus, the LR-model's output can be used as a screening tool to follow-up a person's recovery status post-TKA. Person-specific relationships between the probabilities and patient-reported functioning show that the recovery process varies, favouring individual approaches in rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeGaitHumansRecovery of FunctionWalkingbiomechanicsclassificationinertial measurement unitsmachine learningosteoarthritistotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35632107
PMCPMC9143351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.