Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632022›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

What Actually Works for Activity Recognition in Scenarios with Significant Domain Shift: Lessons Learned from the 2019 and 2020 Sussex-Huawei Challenges.

Stefan Kalabakov, Simon Stankoski, Ivana Kiprijanovska, Andrejaana Andova, Nina Reščič, Vito Janko, Martin Gjoreski, Matjaž Gams, Mitja Luštrek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan KalabakovDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Simon StankoskiDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivana KiprijanovskaDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrejaana AndovaDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nina ReščičDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-5428-3577
Vito JankoDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-9742
Martin GjoreskiFaculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1220-7418
Matjaž GamsDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-5747-0711
Mitja LuštrekDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-2935
Jožef Stefan Institute · SIUniversità della Svizzera italiana · CH

Funding

European Commission 952279Slovenian Research Agency P2-0209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 2018 to 2021, the Sussex-Huawei Locomotion-Transportation Recognition Challenge presented different scenarios in which participants were tasked with recognizing eight different modes of locomotion and transportation using sensor data from smartphones. In 2019, the main challenge was using sensor data from one location to recognize activities with sensors in another location, while in the following year, the main challenge was using the sensor data of one person to recognize the activities of other persons. We use these two challenge scenarios as a framework in which to analyze the effectiveness of different components of a machine-learning pipeline for activity recognition. We show that: (i) selecting an appropriate (location-specific) portion of the available data for training can improve the F1 score by up to 10 percentage points (p. p.) compared to a more naive approach, (ii) separate models for human locomotion and for transportation in vehicles can yield an increase of roughly 1 p. p., (iii) using semi-supervised learning can, again, yield an increase of roughly 1 p. p., and (iv) temporal smoothing of predictions with Hidden Markov models, when applicable, can bring an improvement of almost 10 p. p. Our experiments also indicate that the usefulness of advanced feature selection techniques and clustering to create person-specific models is inconclusive and should be explored separately in each use-case.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSupervised Machine LearningHumansLocomotionMachine LearningSmartphoneactivity recognitioncompetitionHidden Markov modelsmachine learningsemi-supervised learningsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35632022
PMCPMC9145859
OpenAlexW4280576721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.