ReviewPolymers2022
A Comprehensive Review of Biopolymer Fabrication in Additive Manufacturing Processing for 3D-Tissue-Engineering Scaffolds.
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additively manufactured reinforced polymeric stents for peripheral artery disease: design, manufacture and performance evaluation.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Engineering macrophage responses through 3D scaffold microarchitecture.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Smart and Biodegradable Polymers in Tissue Engineering and Interventional Devices: A Brief Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Applications and Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting Sustainable Scaffolding Techniques.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering: The Role of Melt Electrowriting in 3D-Printed Scaffold Fabrication.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Review
- Decellularized Persian walnut leaf (Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Investigation of Calcium Phosphate-Based Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Engineering of Bioresorbable Polymers for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Vat-based photopolymerization 3D printing: From materials to topical and transdermal applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Review
- Functionalization of Ceramic Scaffolds with Exosomes from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Highly Reinforced Acrylic Resins for Hard Tissue Engineering and Their Suitability to Be Additively Manufactured through Nozzle-Based Photo-Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Emerging Strategies for the Biofabrication of Multilayer Composite Amniotic Membranes for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Additive Manufacturing of Polymer/Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine: A Review.Polymers · 2023Review
- Scaffolds and Surfaces with Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2023Article
- Influence of Process Parameters on the Characteristics of Additively Manufactured Parts Made from Advanced Biopolymers.Polymers · 2023Review
- Additive Manufactured Polymers in Dentistry, Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives-A Review.Polymers · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The selection of a scaffold-fabrication method becomes challenging due to the variety in manufacturing methods, biomaterials and technical requirements. The design and development of tissue engineering scaffolds depend upon the porosity, which provides interconnected pores, suitable mechanical strength, and the internal scaffold architecture. The technology of the additive manufacturing (AM) method via photo-polymerization 3D printing is reported to have the capability to fabricate high resolution and finely controlled dimensions of a scaffold. This technology is also easy to operate, low cost and enables fast printing, compared to traditional methods and other additive manufacturing techniques. This article aims to review the potential of the photo-polymerization 3D-printing technique in the fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds. This review paper also highlights the comprehensive comparative study between photo-polymerization 3D printing with other scaffold fabrication techniques. Various parameter settings that influence mechanical properties, biocompatibility and porosity behavior are also discussed in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.