Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631952›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Experimental Modal Analysis and Characterization of Additively Manufactured Polymers.

Hieu Tri Nguyen, Kelly Crittenden, Leland Weiss, Hamzeh Bardaweel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hieu Tri NguyenInstitute for Micromanufacturing, College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA.
Kelly CrittendenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA.
Leland WeissInstitute for Micromanufacturing, College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6904-1412
Hamzeh BardaweelInstitute for Micromanufacturing, College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern 3D printed components are finding applications in dynamic structures. These structures are often subject to dynamic loadings. To date, research has mostly focused on investigating the mechanical properties of these 3D printed structures with minimum attention paid to their modal analysis. This work is focused on performing experimental modal analysis of 3D printed structures. The results show that the adhesion type has the most significant impact on the vibration response and parameters obtained from the modal analysis. The average dynamic modulus, natural frequency, and damping coefficient increased by approximately 12.5%, 5.5%, and 36%, respectively, for the specimens printed using skirt adhesion compared to those printed using raft adhesion. SEM analysis suggests that the 3D printed specimens with skirt adhesion yielded flattened layers, while raft adhesion resulted in rounded layers. The flattened layers of the specimens with skirt adhesion are likely an indication of an enhanced heat transfer between the 3D printer bed and the specimen. The printed specimens with skirt adhesion are in direct contact with the printer bed during the printing process. This enhances the heat transfer between the specimen and the printer bed, causing the layers to flatten out. The enhanced heat transfer yields a better inter-layer diffusion, resulting in improved physical bonding at the layers' interface. The improved bonding yields higher stiffnesses and natural frequencies. For the specimens with skirt adhesion, the improved heat transfer process is also likely responsible for the enhanced damping properties. The strengthened inter-layer bonding at the layer-layer interface provides better energy dissipation along the contact lines between the layers.

Indexed as

3D printed materials3D printed polymersABScharacterization of 3D printed structuresexperimental modal analysisfused deposition modeling

Identifiers

PMID35631952
PMCPMC9147211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.