Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631869›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Effect on the Properties of Edible Starch-Based Films by the Incorporation of Additives: A Review.

Gurvendra Pal Singh, Sneh Punia Bangar, Tianxi Yang, Monica Trif, Vinod Kumar, Dinesh Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Gurvendra Pal SinghSchool of Bioengineering and Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, PO Sultanpur, Distt., Solan 173229, HP, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0589-0236
Sneh Punia BangarDepartment of Food, Nutrition and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8675-6399
Tianxi YangFood, Nutrition and Health Program, Faculty of Land and Food System, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Monica TrifCentre for Innovative Process Engineering (CENTIV) GmbH, Food Research Department, 28816 Stuhr, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6538-0815
Vinod KumarCentre for Climate and Environmental Protection, School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.
Dinesh KumarSchool of Bioengineering and Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, PO Sultanpur, Distt., Solan 173229, HP, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3485-6408
Shoolini University · INCentre for innovative process engineering · DEClemson University · USCranfield University · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, people more actively pursuing biodegradable-based food packaging to lower the environmental problems of plastic-based packaging. Starch could become a promising alternative to plastic because of its properties (easily available, nontoxic, tasteless, biodegradable, ecofriendly, and edible). This review article is focused mainly on the impact of the properties of starch-based biodegradable films, such as their thickness, morphology, and optical, water-barrier, mechanical, oxygen-barrier, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties, after the incorporation of additives, and how such films fulfill the demands of the manufacturing of biodegradable and edible food-based film with preferable performance. The incorporation of additives in starch-based films is largely explained by its functioning as a filler, as shown via a reduction in water and oxygen permeability, increased thickness, and better mechanical properties. Additives also showed antimicrobial and antioxidant properties in the films/coatings, which would positively impact the shelf life of coated or wrapped food material.

Indexed as

active packagingadditivesedible filmsstarch

Identifiers

PMID35631869
PMCPMC9147565
OpenAlexW4280600630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.