ArticlePolymers2022
Tailoring Interfacial Adhesion between PBAT Matrix and PTFE-Modified Microcrystalline Cellulose Additive for Advanced Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-performance PTFE composites from industrial scrap with enhanced strength and wear resistance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellulose materials have the potential to serve as sustainable reinforcement in polymer composites, but they suffer from challenges in improving interfacial compatibility with polymers through surface modification. Here, we propose adjusting the interfacial compatibility between microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) through the strategy based on surface energy regulation. Mechanical ball milling with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) powder was used to simultaneously pulverize, and surface modify MCC to produce MCC sheets with different surface energy. The modified MCC was used to reinforce PBAT composites by simple melt blending. The surface morphology, surface energy of MCC, and the amount of friction transferred PTFE during ball milling were characterized. The mechanical performance, composite morphology, crystallization behavior and dynamic thermomechanical analysis of the composites were investigated. The interfacial adhesion strength of composites closely relates to the surface energy of modified MCC. When the surface energy of MCC is closer to that of the PBAT matrix, it exhibits the better interfacial adhesion strength, resulting in the increased mechanical properties, crystallization temperature, storage modulus, and loss modulus. This work provides effective strategy for how to design fillers to obtain high-performance composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.